This past week, US Director of National Intelligence, Tulsi Gabbard, disclosed a once-classified report from the House Intelligence Committee shedding light on Russia’s involvement in the 2016 election. The report unveils Russia’s access to sensitive DNC information regarding Hillary Clinton’s health.
The intel alleges that Clinton was concealing psychological and physical disorders unknown even to her advisors. The revelation raised concerns among Obama and Democratic leaders who feared it could jeopardize her election prospects.
Notably, Russia chose to withhold this damaging information during the 2016 race, prompting questions on their motives and knowledge.
The report further reveals how Russian intelligence obtained DNC communications detailing internal worries about Clinton’s well-being. It highlights:
Concerns During Obama’s Era:
The report portrays President Obama and top Democrats as deeply troubled by Clinton’s declining health, considering it a substantial negative impact on her campaign. This critical information remained strictly confidential, with even senior campaign advisors left unaware.
Psychological Profile:
Allegedly, Russian SVR sources obtained documents outlining Clinton’s intensified psychological issues, which included uncontrolled bouts of anger, reliance on heavy tranquilizers, and an unwavering thirst for power.
Physical Health Revelations:
The SVR information indicated health challenges faced by Clinton. Surprisingly, Russia opted not to expose the most damaging details, despite accusations of favoring Trump.
Analysts speculate that the Kremlin presumed a Clinton victory and retained the information for post-election use.
The declassification of the report by Tulsi Gabbard under President Trump’s administration has stirred controversies, indicating selective disclosure in the Russia-Trump collusion narrative.
The revelations challenge the Steele Dossier’s credibility, revealing foreign adversaries’ deep insights into Democratic turmoil while scrutinizing the dissemination of intelligence during the Obama era.
Clinton has refrained from responding to this disclosure, though the internal DNC communications seem to conflict with previous dismissals of health-related speculations.
This revelation shifts focus from email scandals to the Democratic Party’s internal divisions and Russia’s influence, raising questions on the political narrative’s authenticity.
