Is MicroStrategy’s mNAV Premium Gone for Good?
MicroStrategy, a company synonymous with Bitcoin investing, has faced significant financial challenges in 2025. The market-to-net-asset value (mNAV) premium, once a key driver of its equity-based Bitcoin acquisition strategy, has collapsed to near parity. This shift raises major questions about the sustainability of Michael Saylor’s highly leveraged Bitcoin investment model.
What is mNAV and Why Does it Matter?
mNAV, or market-to-net-asset value, is a measure of how much investors are willing to pay over (or below) the company’s underlying asset value—primarily its Bitcoin holdings. At its peak, MicroStrategy’s mNAV enabled the firm to issue equity at a premium value, raising funds for further Bitcoin accumulation while increasing its shareholder value. But this model’s reliance on healthy premiums is now under scrutiny, as mNAV has dropped below parity.
The Current Financial Situation
MicroStrategy currently holds approximately 649,870 BTC, purchased at a total cost of $48.4 billion. However, its equity no longer trades at the heightened multiples that once supported its aggressive Bitcoin strategy. In November, mNAV dropped below 1x, reflecting skepticism surrounding its capitalization structure, rising preferred dividends, and declining operational cash flow.
Further complicating matters, Bitcoin experienced a sharp 30% drop in price from its October highs, trading below $90,000. MicroStrategy’s stock has fallen even faster, overshadowed by fears of dilution and concerns about its reliance on capital markets for liquidity. The company spends $640 million annually in preferred dividends but has only $54 million in cash reserves, with its software business running cash-flow negative.
The Impact on Bitcoin Accumulation
The collapse of the mNAV premium fundamentally shifts MicroStrategy’s Bitcoin strategy. When its equity traded at high premiums, issuing shares was accretive, as it increased Bitcoin per share for existing investors. However, issuing shares at or near parity risks diluting shareholder value. This is compounded by MicroStrategy’s rising cost of capital—new financial instruments now carry double-digit dividend rates, posing significant burden on the company’s reserves.
Adding to these concerns, the MSCI index is consulting on excluding companies with more than 50% of their assets in digital currencies. MicroStrategy, with BTC accounting for roughly 77% of its asset share, could face $2.8 billion to $8.8 billion in potential outflows if it’s removed from major indices. This would further pressure its mNAV, making equity issuance even less viable.
The Broader Market Effect
The October crypto market crash served as a wake-up call for investors. Leveraged liquidations exceeded $19 billion, highlighting the fragility of liquidity during stress periods. For a company like MicroStrategy, which controls more than 3% of Bitcoin’s total supply, fears of forced selling have heightened significantly.
Moreover, the emergence of spot Bitcoin ETFs offers investors exposure to Bitcoin without the added risk of corporate leverage or debt, undermining the once-unique investment appeal of MicroStrategy’s stock. The market’s shift toward simplicity could leave companies heavily dependent on mNAV premiums struggling to compete.
Will the mNAV Premium Return?
The future is uncertain. MicroStrategy might recover its mNAV premium if Bitcoin rallies or if index providers reverse their policy stance. However, structural pressures—such as rising dividend obligations and negative operational cash flows—make the company more vulnerable than ever. Michael Saylor’s long-term Bitcoin vision is now clouded by short-term liquidity risks and market skepticism.
Looking for Bitcoin exposure with lower risk? If you prefer to avoid corporate debt and liquidity risks, consider investing in Bitcoin through a reliable spot Bitcoin ETF, such as BlackRock’s iShares Bitcoin Trust (learn more here).
Final Thoughts
MicroStrategy’s mNAV premium collapse signifies a broader reassessment of leverage and liquidity in the Bitcoin market. Investors are less willing to pay a premium for indirect Bitcoin exposure when alternatives, like ETFs, are readily available. The coming months will reveal whether MicroStrategy can navigate this challenging terrain or whether its leveraged model will need a significant overhaul.
Stay up to date with the latest insights and news on Bitcoin and the evolving crypto market by subscribing to our newsletter!
