The cryptocurrency sector continues to face intense scrutiny as three U.S. House Democrats have raised significant concerns about the Securities and Exchange Commission’s (SEC) recent enforcement actions—or lack thereof—against key players in the crypto world. In a formal letter sent to SEC Chairman Paul Atkins, Representatives Maxine Waters, Sean Casten, and Brad Sherman criticized the agency for appearing to backtrack on its mandate to protect investors.
SEC’s Retreat and Controversial Crypto Cases
According to the letter, the SEC has dismissed or paused several high-profile enforcement actions since 2025, including cases involving prominent companies like Binance, Coinbase, and Kraken. Lawmakers noted that this decreased regulation comes at a time when crypto-related risks remain significant for investors.
“The industry’s track record of investor harm and the mandate of securities laws to protect market participants make this retreat deeply concerning,” stated the representatives. They further alleged that the SEC’s reduced enforcement efforts coincide suspiciously with increased political contributions from cryptocurrency firms.
Political Donations Raising Eyebrows
The lawmakers highlighted a troubling financial connection between crypto companies and political campaigns. They claim crypto firms donated at least $85 million to former President Donald Trump’s reelection campaign. Furthermore, companies like Coinbase, Kraken, Ripple, Robinhood, and Crypto.com—whose enforcement actions were reportedly dismissed—each contributed over $1 million to Trump’s inauguration efforts. These lawmakers suggested that such political donations might point to a “pay-to-play” scheme, raising concerns about the integrity of regulatory oversight.
The Justin Sun Case: A Symbol of Selective Enforcement?
One focal point of the critique is the SEC’s handling of a case against Justin Sun, founder of the Tron blockchain. Previously sued by the SEC in 2023 for alleged crypto securities violations and market manipulation, the case has been left in limbo for 11 months as regulators explore a possible settlement. Lawmakers argue this prolonged pause signals selective enforcement by the SEC, suggesting that individuals with political influence can avoid accountability.
The controversy is further complicated by Sun’s alleged ties to Chinese interests. Representatives cited his connections to Chinese officials, involvement in research programs at China’s Central Party School, and collaborative efforts with state media. These relationships raise both regulatory and national security questions.
Calls for Transparency and Action
In addition to their letter to Chairman Atkins, the lawmakers have requested document preservation related to the SEC’s decisions, demanding full transparency. They argue that Congress must have access to communications with third parties to determine whether political pressures played any role in enforcement decisions. The protection of investors and the credibility of U.S. regulatory bodies remain at the center of these concerns.
What This Means for Crypto Regulation Moving Forward
The SEC’s stance on cryptocurrency will likely shape the future of investor confidence in the crypto market. The lawmakers’ allegations underscore the importance of enforcing securities laws without political bias. For the average investor, staying informed about regulatory developments is essential in navigating this quickly evolving sector.
Recommended Product: Ledger Nano X Crypto Wallet
If you’re investing in cryptocurrency, ensure your assets are secure with the Ledger Nano X Crypto Wallet. This cutting-edge hardware wallet supports a wide array of digital currencies, providing top-notch security for safeguarding your investments. Its Bluetooth functionality also makes it convenient for on-the-go asset management.
