Judge Temporarily Blocks Connecticut’s Actions Against Kalshi Over Gambling Laws
Connecticut’s efforts to enforce gambling laws against the prediction market platform Kalshi have been put on hold by a federal judge. This temporary order prevents the state from taking enforcement actions while the court evaluates Kalshi’s request for a preliminary injunction. Let’s explore the details behind this major legal development.
Why Is Kalshi at the Center of a Legal Dispute?
In December 2025, Connecticut’s Department of Consumer Protection issued cease-and-desist letters to Kalshi, as well as other platforms like Robinhood and Crypto.com. The state alleged these platforms were engaging in unlicensed online sports betting, a breach of its gaming laws. The regulators demanded that these platforms cease their operations in Connecticut immediately and allow users to withdraw funds, warning of civil penalties and potential criminal charges for noncompliance.
Kalshi, however, argues that it operates under the exclusive federal jurisdiction granted by the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC), making Connecticut’s state gambling laws inapplicable to its operations. The company asserts that federal law under the Commodity Exchange Act preempts state regulations regarding its platform. This isn’t Kalshi’s first legal clash on this front—it had previously won a similar case in New Jersey, where federal courts ruled in its favor.
Temporary Relief Granted to Kalshi
On December 10, 2025, U.S. District Judge Victor Bolden instructed Connecticut state officials to halt any enforcement efforts until a ruling is reached on Kalshi’s motion for a preliminary injunction. Oral arguments are scheduled for February 12, 2026, leaving both parties in a legal standoff in the interim.
While Kalshi moves ahead with its arguments, Connecticut maintains its stance that the company has been violating state gaming and consumer protection laws. The state aims to enforce these laws for the perceived benefit of its residents, but for now, the temporary order puts those measures on pause.
Broader Implications
This legal battle between state regulators and Kalshi may set a precedent for how prediction markets and similar platforms operate across the U.S. More states, like Arizona and Illinois, are likely to enter the fray, prompting further legal challenges. For instance, Nevada recently ruled against Kalshi, refusing to grant it a preliminary injunction, though enforcement actions have been temporarily paused there as well, pending appeals.
Additionally, Kalshi faces growing competition from other platforms such as Polymarket, which was recently cleared by the CFTC to resume U.S. operations after a lengthy hiatus. Industry experts predict this battle between state-level regulators and federally regulated markets will only intensify in the coming years.
What Does This Mean for Investors and Gamers?
For those engaged in prediction markets or online betting, this legal development underscores the importance of understanding how local laws interact with federally regulated platforms. Platforms such as Kalshi claim to provide legally compliant opportunities for investment; however, state regulators continue to argue that they fall under state gaming laws.
A Product That Fits
If you’re interested in exploring prediction markets as an investor, consider starting with regulated platforms like Robinhood or Polymarket. These platforms offer user-friendly interfaces and are backed by compliance with federal regulations. Exercise caution when navigating state-specific restrictions to ensure a safe and legal experience.
