The legal drama surrounding Sue Mi Terry, a former White House official, continues to captivate attention as she faces prosecution on accusations of acting as an unregistered foreign agent for South Korea. However, fresh revelations about the FBI’s handling of her case have raised questions about procedural conduct and constitutional rights.
FBI’s Questionable Conduct Sparks Controversy
Sue Mi Terry, 55, a former CIA analyst and a regular figure in New York’s think-tank circles, accused FBI agents of demeaning treatment during an early-morning interrogation in her Manhattan apartment. In a sworn statement filed with the Southern District of New York, she claimed the agents refused her request to change clothes or put on a bra before the questioning began.
‘The agents did not permit me to change or even put on a bra, even though my bedroom was only a few steps away,’ Terry wrote. Later, she was allowed to change—but only under the supervision of a female agent, a situation she described as ‘demeaning.’
Federal officers reportedly arrived at her Upper West Side home on June 5, 2023, at 8:40 a.m., catching her still in pajamas. These allegations have cast a shadow over the prosecution’s case, with Terry’s legal team arguing that the conduct was unprofessional and prejudicial.
The FARA Charges: Gifts, Influence, and Allegations
Terry is accused of violating the Foreign Agents Registration Act (FARA), a law requiring individuals lobbying on behalf of foreign governments to register with the U.S. Justice Department. Prosecutors allege that she secretly advanced South Korean policy positions, leaked non-public U.S. government information, and facilitated access to Washington power players—all while receiving lavish gifts.
The indictment details designer handbags, a Dolce & Gabbana coat, luxury dinners, and $37,000 in covert funding allegedly provided by South Korean officials. Surveillance images included in court filings show Terry outside high-end boutiques such as Bottega Veneta and Louis Vuitton, South Korean handlers reportedly footing the bills.
She is also accused of publishing op-eds at the behest of South Korea, including a column praising a summit between President Joe Biden and South Korean President Yoon Suk Yeol, reportedly for a $500 fee.
A Career Under Scrutiny
Born in Seoul and raised in Virginia, Terry served in key roles during her illustrious career, including as a CIA analyst and later as director of Korean, Japanese, and Oceanic Affairs at the National Security Council under Presidents George W. Bush and Barack Obama. More recently, she was a senior fellow at the Council on Foreign Relations until being placed on unpaid leave following her indictment.
Terry, along with her husband Max Boot—a historian and Washington Post columnist—resides in a $2.2 million apartment on the Upper West Side. A fixture in Manhattan’s social scene, the ongoing case has reportedly disrupted her social life and professional engagements.
Constitutional Challenges and Advocacy Support
Terry’s defense team has shifted focus to the broader implications of the prosecution, arguing that the charges threaten the work of academics, journalists, and foreign policy experts. Groups like the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), the Knight First Amendment Institute, and the Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press have filed supportive amicus briefs.
‘Over the last decade, FARA has increasingly been used to stifle dissent,’ said ACLU Senior Counsel Aamra Ahmad. Critics of FARA have long described it as vague and outdated, a relic of its 1938 roots targeting Nazi propaganda. Many experts see the law as selectively enforced, creating a chilling effect on free speech.
A Shifting Policy Landscape
Recent changes in federal enforcement policies may further complicate this high-profile case. Attorney General Pam Bondi recently disbanded the Foreign Influence Task Force, redirecting resources towards more pressing national security priorities. Her memo emphasized limiting FARA prosecutions to traditional espionage cases, casting doubt over the relevance of Terry’s alleged actions to the law’s original intent.
As the debate over FARA continues, Terry’s legal battle serves as a focal point for examining how the law is applied. Allegations of FBI misconduct, coupled with constitutional concerns raised by her attorneys and advocates, may have broader implications for foreign policy professionals and journalists alike.
