Berachain, the promising blockchain platform, is under the spotlight after leaked documents exposed a controversial investment arrangement favoring key institutional backers. This revelation has sent shockwaves through the crypto investment community, raising concerns about transparency and fairness in fundraising rounds.
The Secret Refund Clause
At the core of the controversy lies a hidden refund clause secured by Nova Digital, the crypto division of Brevan Howard. Leaked documents reveal that Nova invested $25 million in Berachain during its Series B funding round in April 2024 at $3 per BERA token. However, the contentious clause, buried in a side letter dated March 5, 2024, permits Nova to reclaim their investment if the project struggles.
The clause, which functions like a “put option,” enables Nova to request a refund until February 6, 2026—one year after Berachain’s projected token generation event. This safety net shields Nova from financial losses while granting them potential upside if BERA tokens perform well in the market.
Market Fallout and Investor Losses
Since the Series B round, BERA token values have plummeted by 67%, trading around $1. Co-investors like Framework Ventures, who co-led the funding, face steep paper losses exceeding $50 million. Meanwhile, Nova’s safety net allows them to walk away with minimal risk, sparking backlash from other investors.
This raises significant concerns about the “Most Favored Nation” (MFN) clauses typically present in such agreements. Two investors, speaking anonymously to investigative outlet Unchained, claim they were unaware of Nova’s preferential terms, potentially violating MFN provisions and setting an uneven playing field within the investment.
For more detailed insights into current crypto trends, consider exploring platforms like Ledger Cold Wallets to secure digital assets while navigating volatile markets.
Industry Responses and Legal Concerns
Crypto lawyers interviewed about the Berachain clause have branded it “extremely rare” and note that refunds typically apply only when projects fail to launch—not when tokens underperform. Pseudonymous Berachain co-founder, Smokey The Bera, defended the terms, stating the clause aimed to address regulatory compliance requirements for Brevan Howard’s Abu Dhabi-based investment fund.
Smokey also emphasized that Nova remains a significant investor and liquidity provider in Berachain, claiming their holdings have increased since launch. However, this defense has done little to quell critics who highlight the lack of transparency as a growing concern in crypto fundraising practices.
The Bigger Picture
This incident lays bare the opaque nature of venture capital deals in the blockchain world. It underscores the urgent need for industry-wide standardized practices and stronger disclosure mechanisms, especially as the global crypto market continues to evolve.
As the deadline for Nova’s refund option approaches in February 2026, the crypto community, co-investors, and market analysts are keenly observing whether the terms will be exercised. The outcome could set a precedent for future funding agreements across the cryptocurrency landscape.
In an unpredictable industry, staying informed is crucial. For more insights into managing your crypto assets, check out Ledger’s hardware wallet solutions.
