This week, US Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard publicly released a once-classified report from the House Intelligence Committee shining a light on the 2016 election and Russia’s knowledge of the Democratic Party’s internal affairs.
The declassified report exposes that Russia had insights into confidential DNC data concerning Hillary Clinton’s health, detailing undisclosed psychological and physical issues.
Top officials, including Obama and Democratic leaders, expressed deep concern over Clinton’s health status, considering it a severe threat to her electoral prospects.
These revelations prompt further interrogation into Russia’s motivations for withholding critical information throughout the 2016 election cycle.
The report from the House Intelligence Committee, now declassified, provides new details on what Russia knew about the Democrats in 2016. While much focus was on Trump’s alleged ties to Moscow, unredacted sections of the report reveal Russia possessed damaging intel on Clinton but refrained from publicizing it.
By September 2016, Russian intelligence had accessed DNC communications indicating internal worries about Clinton’s mental and physical well-being. Significant findings outlined in the report include:
Obama-era Concerns:
The report highlights the alarm among President Obama and senior Democrats regarding Clinton’s declining health, which they viewed as a serious threat to her campaign. This information was strictly confidential, with even key campaign advisors unaware of the extent of the issue.
Psychological Profile:
According to Russian SVR sources, internal DNC documents depicted Clinton as experiencing heightened psychological challenges, such as unpredictable bouts of anger, dependency on strong tranquilizers, and an intense desire for power.
Physical Health Details:
The report also revealed Russia’s knowledge of Clinton’s undisclosed health problems.
One of the report’s surprising claims is that Russia opted not to disclose the most damaging information it possessed about Clinton, despite accusations of supporting Trump.
Analysts suggest that Russia may have anticipated a Clinton victory, leading them to keep sensitive health-related information for potential leverage post-election. Alternatively, Russia might have sought to preserve the data for diplomatic bargaining.
The House Intelligence Committee compiled the initial report during the Trump administration, but substantial portions remained classified or heavily redacted under subsequent administrations. Tulsi Gabbard, currently serving as DNI under President Trump, sanctioned the report’s full disclosure, emphasizing transparency and public awareness of the events in 2016.
These revelations contribute to a broader perspective that the Russia-Trump collusion narrative was partially disclosed, withholding essential context. This situation raises a critical global question: If Russia possessed more damaging information about Clinton, why did the focus shift to allegations against Trump?
The recent disclosures challenge the credibility of the Steele Dossier, indicating heightened foreign involvement in Democratic internal conflicts beyond previous acknowledgments. They also prompt scrutiny into the handling of intelligence dissemination by past U.S. officials.
As of now, Hillary Clinton has not responded to the latest disclosures. Her team previously dismissed health-related rumors as baseless conspiracy theories. However, internal DNC communications shared in the report suggest contrary private acknowledgements, signaling a deeper narrative beyond email scandals and server breaches.
This declassified report unveils:
- A fractured and panicking Democratic Party facing health concerns about their nominee
- The infiltration of a foreign power privy to this internal turmoil
- A narrative possibly shaped more by political agendas than reality
FAQs:
Who declassified the information?
The complete report was declassified by Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard, now part of President Trump’s administration.
Which agency intercepted the intel?
Russia’s SVR allegedly intercepted internal DNC communications disclosing concerns about Hillary Clinton’s health.
Is there independent verification of Clinton’s illnesses?
No medical records have been released to substantiate the specific health claims, but the report cites internal DNC communications and SVR intercepts as sources.
Why didn’t Russia disclose this damaging information?
Some analysts speculate that Russia expected Clinton’s victory and retained critical material for post-election leverage.
What are the political implications?
The revelations question the narrative that Russian interference solely benefited Trump, highlighting transparency issues within previous intelligence administrations.